Call for Papers

Workshop: Furthering or Fighting Core State Power Integration? The Post-Maastricht Ambiguities of German EU Policy

24 and 25 June 2019, Hertie School of Governance, Berlin

Which role does Germany play in core state power (CSP) integration? Since Maastricht, the EU has increasingly expanded into member states' coercive force, public finances and administration. However, combining regulatory interventionism with a minimum of redistribution and supranational capacity-building, the Union opted for an unsustainable mode of CSP integration. In addition, CSPs have proven susceptible to national identity politics and mass politicization. Consequently, they are the most vulnerable field of the EU - as exemplified by the Euro and Schengen crises. In an attempt to answer the question of how and why the Union has chosen this unsustainable path of CSP integration, we engage in an in-depth analysis of German EU policy since Maastricht.

Why Germany? First, the reunified country has arguably become Europe's economic and political powerhouse. The recent crises illustrated this leading role but also Germany's starkly varying approach to different fields of CSP integration. Second, Germany is a critical case for change. Once lauded a motor of integration, the German stance on the EU and its finalité became more ambiguous after Maastricht. Not only has the country witnessed the rise of the Eurosceptic Alternative for Germany. The traditionally pro-European Christian Democratic Union, too, has exposed increasing rifts on EU affairs. Angela Merkel, in this vein, seems more critical of supranational modes of integration than her predecessors were, with her conception of the Union method deviating substantially from the traditional Community method. Third, from a theoretical viewpoint, the German case sheds light on the institutional, political and ideational factors that underlie a central member state's formation of preferences on CSP integration.

  • Which role has Germany played in the emergence of the above-described mode of CSP integration?
  • Which institutional, political and ideational factors underlie the German approach to CSP integration?
  • When, where and why have German governments chosen to further or to fight CSP integration?

To prepare a joint publication approaching the puzzle of German EU policy post-Maastricht, we will gather 10 to 12 scholars for an in-depth debate over two days. On the first day of our workshop, we will explore the institutional, political and ideational factors underlying German EU policy towards CSPs and their crises. On the second day, we will trace these factors' impact on specific policy fields over time. Consequently, we seek both theoretically driven pieces explaining interests, ideas and influence in German EU policy, and more empirical contributions which focus on Germany's approach to specific fields of CSP integration. Papers discussed at the workshop should comprise 15 to 20 pages. We are happy to receive proposals from scholars at any level - PhD students at an advanced stage, postdoctoral and senior researchers alike. Within reasonable limits, we will cover travel and accommodation expenses.

Paper Submission

  • Abstracts (max 300 words): 14 December 2018 to Christian Freudlsperger (freudlsperger[at]hertie-school[dot]org)
  • Notification of participants: 18 January 2019
  • Final Paper submission: 17 June 2019
Collapse

Workshop Date and Venue

  • 24 & 25 June 2019
  • Hertie School of Governance, Friedrichstr. 194, 10117 Berlin, Germany
Collapse

Convenors

  • Markus Jachtenfuchs, Christian Freudlsperger, Franca König (all Hertie School), Martin Weinrich (European University Institute)
  • Jacques Delors Institute Berlin - Centre for European Affairs at the Hertie School of Governance
  • Website: delors.hertie-school.org, Phone: +49 30 259 219 339
Collapse