Christian Gläßel unearths violent pattern surrounding 1978 World Cup

This year’s Winter Olympics and the FIFA World Cup are being hosted by authoritarian regimes (China and Qatar). This is part of a growing pattern, which urgently begs the question how hosting these international sports events interacts with repression and violence against political dissidents. Hertie School postdoctoral researcher Christian Gläßel, along with co-authors Adam Scharpf (University of Copenhagen) and Pearce Edwards (Carnegie Mellon), sets out to investigate this linkage in the new paper “International Sports Events, Media Attention, and Autocratic Repression: Evidence from the 1978 FIFA World Cup”, which appeared in the American Political Science Review.

The paper is the first to systematically investigate how international mega-events impact the local dynamics of state repression. It focuses on patterns of repression and violence by the Argentinian military junta before, during, and after the 1978 FIFA World Cup, a case which is unusually well-documented thanks to the efforts of the country’s post-dictatorship truth commission. Remarkably, the authors find substantial evidence that the use of force escalated in host cities prior to the World Cup and immediately following the World Cup. During the event, however, repression decreased sharply, was softened, and mostly took place during journalists’ working hours (that is, during World Cup matches), an effect most noticeable in the immediate vicinity of journalists’ hotels.

As Gläßel and his co-authors explain, hosting international sports events presents both a huge opportunity and a substantial risk to authoritarian regimes. These events attract a peerless global audience; for example, almost 50% of the world’s population watched the 2016 Summer Olympics. Such an audience gives authoritarian regimes an enormous global platform to combat negative perceptions and show a rosier picture of the state of their country. On the other hand, these events come along with a raft of curious foreign journalists who can do substantial damage to a regime’s image if any evidence of wrongdoing emerges.

Gläßel and his co-authors term this the scrutiny-publicity dilemma, and offer critical insights into how authoritarian regimes navigate this dilemma by strategically dialling repression up or down to “minimize the risk of both international pillorying and domestic dissent”. The results of the study clearly reject the whitewashing rhetoric of sports functionaries, sponsors, and autocrats, and show that major sporting events in dictatorships have devastating consequences for democracy and opposition activists. In addition to contributing to various research strands, these findings can also help human rights organisations and activists identify where and when repression around sports events is likely to occur. As global coverage of international sports competitions continues to increase, this research contributes to sounding the alarm about how these events can become a mouthpiece for authoritarian regimes and a vessel for repression and violence against dissidents.
 

Read the full article here.

The Hertie School is not responsible for any content linked or referred to from these pages. Views expressed by the author/interviewee may not necessarily reflect the views and values of the Hertie School.