27-29 January 2020 | Executive seminar
The type of social outcomes that are studied in public and non-profit administration are usually determined by a complex set of factors. It is consequently difficult to understand the effect of a given policy or change in a specific factor on outcomes. Experimental scientists solve this problem with careful laboratory controls that let only a single factor vary. Most social scientists and policy analysts do not have the luxury of a controlled laboratory setting and must analyse pre-existing observational data in which multiple variables change. Statistical tools such as multiple regression are well suited to this type of data but when misapplied, they can give misleading results. This course trains participants in recognising the proper use and abuse of methods in quantitative research.
Quantitative methods are popular in all types of social analysis from business to government because they can isolate and estimate the magnitude of a single effect on an outcome when several potentially causal variables are at play. This precision cannot be offered by alternative methods such as case studies or uncontrolled comparison. Also, unlike many alternative methods, regression can quantify the degree of uncertainty in its estimates.
Effective managers increasingly need to understand quantitative analysis. Most critically, they must be able to discern properly designed and estimated models from flawed work. And when they suspect a flaw, it is of great advantage to understand whether and how it likely biases results. Participants will complete this course with an enhanced ability to know when to believe the numbers.
This seminar is offered in the open enrolment programme and as part of the Executive MPA programme.
It can also be completed as part of the
- Certificate in Public Financial Management and Methods
- Certificate in Digital Transformation
- Hertie School Data in Public Policy Programme
All seminars can be customised for organisational clients. Learn more.